|
Cooked foods
vs. raw debated
HEALTH: Some officials caution against the no-cooking lifestyle,
but others embrace it
By DOUG BLACKBURN / Albany Times Union
Teshna
Beaulieu typically starts her day with watermelon or sliced avocados
and cucumbers topped with lemon juice, sea salt and tomatoes.
Her beverage of choice is fresh coconut milk.
The
East Chatham, N.Y., chiropractor's routine doesn't change much
as the day goes along. She eats a variety of salads for lunch
and dinner, often adding fresh vegetables or seaweed. She snacks
on nuts. Beaulieu almost never uses her oven or stove. The blender
is the kitchen appliance she turns to most.
Welcome
to the raw food diet. Beaulieu prefers to call it the raw food
way of life, because diet implies a weight-loss program. For Beaulieu,
who started eating raw foods 15 years ago, and others, it's a
lifestyle choice.
"As
the years go by I do it more and more. I feel better with it,"
she says. "When I eat raw food I don't feel tired after a
meal. When I eat cooked food, I feel heavier and more tired."
Raw
food means exactly that -- almost. Proponents of a raw food diet
primarily eat uncooked fruits and vegetables. They also consume
nuts and grains, oftentimes made edible with soaking that in some
cases causes sprouting. However, raw food enthusiasts use a dehydrator
to "cook" certain foods.
Dismissed
by some as a fringe fad or extreme vegetarianism, raw food entered
the mainstream during the past decade.
Raw
food received a ringing endorsement in 2003 when Chicago chef
and restaurateur Charlie Trotter co-authored a cookbook called
"Raw" (Ten Speed Press).
In
addition to blenders and juicers, most raw food advocates employ
a dehydrator to "bake" bread and other foods. Nothing
is heated above 118 degrees, however. The theory is that essential
enzymes are destroyed at temperatures above 118, and these enzymes
need to be properly digested.
Katherine
Tallmadge, a spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association,
has called the diet "dangerous."
She
believes certain segments of the population -- pregnant women,
children, the elderly and people with compromised immune systems
-- would be well advised to limit their intake of raw foods.
"The
idea that cooked food is toxic is absurd. There's absolutely no
science to back that up," Tallmadge says. "The (raw
food) diet is protein-deficient and nutrient-poor."
Source:
http://www.pe.com/lifestyles/food/stories/PE_Fea_Daily_raw0302.efef.html
|